I see no awards for either, and the opinion of nom that one is a travesty carries no weight and should have been left out. But the 1981 film is featured in The Best of Tamil Cinema, a book similar to this.
SATTAM ORU IRUTTARAI 1981 FULL MOVIE ARCHIVE
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. TheFreeloader ( talk) 02:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Sometimes the remake is actually the primary topic, rather than the original, just look at Battlestar Galactica for instance. And you have not demonstrated that people are more likely to look for the original film rather than the remake. Primary topic is about which article a reader is most likely to be looking for when they search for a given term. For instance, the planet Mars is the primary topic for Mars, even though its name comes from the Roman god Mars. Primary topic is not about where the origin of a name is from.This is in a similar situation, and the above-linked WP:TWODABS states, "If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed-it is sufficient to use a hatnote on the primary topic article, pointing to the other article." This film is clearly the primary topic as the 2012 film is a remake of it, hence the reason it has the same title. Comment: Both of you behaved the same way at Thillu Mullu (1981 film), but the majority of editors voted to move it to simply Thillu Mullu.Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC) Oppose per WP:NCF and neither of them look like they could be the primary topic.In ictu oculi ( talk) 08:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC) Oppose per WP:NCF and Sattam Oru Iruttarai (2012 film), there are two films so we let those looking for either find what they are looking for.So this borders on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:TWODABS. Sattam Oru Iruttarai (1981 film) → Sattam Oru Iruttarai – While this film was a milestone in Tamil cinema, the only other film with the same name - the 2012 remake - hardly achieved the same iconic status and recognition.
The result of the move request was: No consensus emerged from the discussion ( non-admin closure) - Andy W. ( talk) 01:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. The following is a closed discussion of a requested move.
0 kommentar(er)
